Will it ever be possible to accurately predict terrorist att…

Will it ever be possible to accurately predict terrorist att…

Read the article in the attachment.
Then answer the following:
Will it ever be possible to accurately predict terrorist attacks, whether in the United States or elsewhere? Why or why not? What tools, skills, and other options may be used to increase the accuracy of predictions? 

APA format is required.

Title page, reference page, in text citations (see above link for help.)

References and in text citations must be formatted in APA.
Course reference(s) and one outside reference are required.

All assignments are scanned by Turn It In Plagiarism checker.

Length of paper should be a minimum of 1-2 written pages. (Title page and reference page are not included in this number.)

3/27/23, 8:38 PM Can We Predict Where Terrorists Will Strike Next? | RAND
https://www.rand.org/blog/2017/06/can-we-predict-where-terrorists-will-strike-next.html 1/5
RAND > The RAND Blog >
Can We Predict Where Terrorists Will
Strike Next? COMMENTARY (Newsweek)
Chemical experts inspect the site of a suicide truck bomb attack at a petrol station in Hilla, Iraq, November 25, 2016 Photo by Alaa Al-Marjani/Reuters
by Brian Michael Jenkins
June 19, 2017
A nalysts and intelligence officials periodically get together to anticipate what
tomorrow’s terrorists might do.
Will terrorists threaten mass destruction with nuclear weapons or global
pandemics with designer pathogens? Will cities be contaminated with dirty bombs?
Will tech-savvy terrorists remotely sabotage power grids or other vital infrastructure via the

3/27/23, 8:38 PM Can We Predict Where Terrorists Will Strike Next? | RAND
https://www.rand.org/blog/2017/06/can-we-predict-where-terrorists-will-strike-next.html 2/5
Had the hijackers been arrested one week before 9/11, their plan might have been dismissed as far- fetched, which it was.
Are terrorists capable of triggering electromagnetic pulses that fry electronics, reducing
modern technology-dependent society to a Mad Max movie? Will they shoot down airliners
with hand-held missiles or bring them down with miniaturized bombs concealed in laptops
or perhaps surgically implanted? Will they attack crowds in stadiums with drones carrying
hand grenades or anthrax or merely white powder to provoke deadly panics?
Or might there be a mass uprising of individual fanatics ramming trucks into pedestrians,
attacking diners with machetes, and carrying out other primitive, but nearly-impossible-to-
prevent attacks?
The scenarios are endless and unnerving. All of the ones above have been discussed publicly.
And if analysts can think about them, one presumes, so can terrorists who fill the internet
with their ambitious fantasies.
Some of these are pretensions of omnipotence that make their authors feel good; some
support the terrorists’ campaign to promote fear.
Few can be entirely disregarded. Had the 9/11 hijackers been arrested one week before their
attack, their plan might have been dismissed as a far-fetched scheme, which it was.
Secretary of Homeland Security John Kelly recently
warned that if Americans knew what he knows about
terrorism, they’d “never leave the house”—a dismaying
message coming from a Marine four-star general.
There are several ways analysts try to gaze into the
future. One is to look at trends in terrorism itself and
see where these might take us.
Extrapolation doesn’t always work. According to data from the Global Terrorism Database,
from 1970 to 2001, fatalities in the worst terrorist attacks increased by an order of magnitude
every 10 to 15 years, culminating in the 9/11 attacks, in which thousands died.
It was widely presumed immediately after 9/11 that terrorists would continue to escalate by
orders of magnitude, pushing the analysis toward scenarios involving tens of thousands or
even hundreds of thousands of fatalities. Death on this scale could be achieved only with the
use of biological or nuclear weapons, which became a presumption.
A second way to look at the future is to try to forecast the state of world affairs and examine
how this might affect the trajectory of terrorism.
Analysts correctly anticipated that the U.S. invasion of Iraq would mobilize new cohorts of
jihadist extremists, but many mistakenly thought that the rise of anarchist elements in the
wake of the 2008 economic crisis might reinvigorate the violent edge of the left—it did not. It

3/27/23, 8:38 PM Can We Predict Where Terrorists Will Strike Next? | RAND
https://www.rand.org/blog/2017/06/can-we-predict-where-terrorists-will-strike-next.html 3/5
is expected that the conflicts in Syria and adjacent areas will remain sources of future
terrorist violence.
A third approach is to look at how terrorists might exploit new technologies coming on line.
Years ago, we worried about surface-to-air missiles, which terrorists have rarely used, but we
missed the internet. Then in its infancy, the internet was to have a profound impact on
terrorist communications, recruiting and strategy, underscoring that terrorism is mainly
about manipulating perceptions. Analysts currently are looking at terrorists using drones
and exploiting the Internet of Things.
A fourth approach is to try to think as terrorists and conjure up scenarios of future attacks.
This is a way to prevent failures of imagination, but possibilities are often misread as
forecasts. In the early 1980s, I opined that terrorists might fly hijacked airliners into large
buildings. This involved no prescience on my part—in 1972, hijackers had threatened to fly a
hijacked plane into the nuclear facilities at Oak Ridge, Tennessee. I repeated the idea over the
years only as a possibility.
Any review of what we might have forecast about the future trajectory of terrorism in the
past should be humbling. Fifty years ago, who knew that the following decades would see the
dramatic rise of terrorism in its contemporary form? One of the major events was the 1967
Six-Day War, which would lead to Israel’s occupation of the West Bank, contributing to the
rise of the Palestinian terrorism.
Who in 1977 forecast the emergence of Islamist extremism in the form of the Iranian
Revolution, the rise of Iranian-supported Shia extremism in Lebanon, and an escalation of
terrorist violence with massive vehicle bombs and suicide attacks becoming routine?
The Middle East would remain a major theater of concern for the United States during this
decade, and Washington would increasingly resort to military force to retaliate for attacks on
U.S. Marines in Lebanon, apprehend terrorist hijackers escaping from Egypt, and deter
further Libyan support for terrorist attacks that had cost American lives.
Hardly any analysts in 1987 foresaw the fall of the Soviet Union in 1989, which would
fundamentally change the world’s political environment and significantly affect the course
of terrorism.
By 1997, al Qaeda had already declared war on the United States, but 1998 would see a
dramatic escalation of that campaign, culminating in the 9/11 attacks that would lead to the
Global War on Terror—a massive worldwide effort that continues to this day.
And in 2007, who foresaw the uprisings that would sweep across the Arab world in 2011,
distracting governments, creating new opportunities for jihadists, and leading to Syria’s civil
war and the rise of ISIS?

3/27/23, 8:38 PM Can We Predict Where Terrorists Will Strike Next? | RAND
https://www.rand.org/blog/2017/06/can-we-predict-where-terrorists-will-strike-next.html 4/5
Terrorism is a global phenomenon. But outside of conflict zones, attacks occur only occasionally.
So what can we say in 2017?
Terrorism has become a mode of armed conflict—it will persist. But the worldwide growth in
the volume of terrorism is misleading. It reflects the invention of the category of terrorism,
better reporting worldwide, and the now routine employment of terrorist tactics in irregular
Although terrorism is a global phenomenon, outside of
conflict zones, where terrorist campaigns comprise
merely one aspect of ongoing wars, terrorist attacks
occur only occasionally. In 2015, more than 55 percent of
all attacks took place in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan,
India, and Nigeria, and 74 percent of all fatalities
occurred in five countries Iraq, Afghanistan, Nigeria,
Syria, and Pakistan.
Terrorism remains concentrated in the Middle East and bordering areas of North Africa and
western Asia. Current conflicts in these areas are likely to persist and will remain the major
source of the terrorist threat. For the United States, terrorism and Middle East policy have
become inextricably intertwined.
Events external to terrorism can have enormous effects on the course of terrorism: the Six-
Day War and Vietnam War as catalysts for protest and ultimately violence; the Iranian
revolution; the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and the rise of Islamic extremism; the fall of
the Soviet Union; the Arab Spring.
Our worst fears have not been realized. Terrorists have seldom used chemical or biological
weapons and then not very effectively. There has been one incident of radiological terrorism,
carried out as a publicity stunt, and no nuclear weapons. Nonetheless, the lure of doom
continues, with many arguing that it is not if, but when terrorists will employ such weapons.
The terrorists’ arsenal has changed very little. Bombs still comprise three-quarters of
terrorist attacks. Some bombs are becoming more sophisticated. Terrorist attacks still involve
automatic or semi-automatic weapons not different from a half-century ago.
Tactical innovations include suicide bombings, multiple suicide bombings, increasingly
random attacks on soft targets, the use of vehicles in ramming attacks. This reflects the
enlistment of remote recruits with limited capabilities, which is itself a consequence of social
Terrorism appears to have escalated horizontally rather than vertically. Instead of weapons
of mass destruction, there has been a proliferation of low-level attacks—frustrating, but
certainly preferable. The trick will be to use what is known about terrorism now to predict
and prevent new attacks.

3/27/23, 8:38 PM Can We Predict Where Terrorists Will Strike Next? | RAND
https://www.rand.org/blog/2017/06/can-we-predict-where-terrorists-will-strike-next.html 5/5
Brian Michael Jenkins is a senior adviser to the president of the nonprofit, nonpartisan RAND
Corporation and an author of numerous books, reports and articles on terrorism-related
This commentary originally appeared on Newsweek on June 19, 2017. Commentary gives
RAND researchers a platform to convey insights based on their professional expertise and
often on their peer-reviewed research and analysis.
Stay Informed Get weekly updates from RAND.
Email address SIGN UP
1776 Main Street Santa Monica, California 90401-3208
RAND® is a registered trademark. © 1994-2023 RAND Corporation.
ABOUT The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help
make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is
nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest.

essaysresearch.org Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we\’ll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Why Hire essaysresearch.org writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.

Rate this post
"Is this question part of your assignment? We will write the assignment for you. click order now and get up to 40% Discount"