Internal and external methods of redressing state failure.
Compare and contrast internal and external methods of redressing state failure. Which way should we lean?
Internal:
Beneficence ( Article by Singer)
rectification (Article by Pogge)
international reform (Article by Wenar)
immigration (Article by Miller)
External:
charter cities (Article by Romer)
shared sovereignty (Article by Krasner)
humanitarian intervention (Article by Bass)
trusteeship ( Lake)
Main argument: All methods have their positive impact. However, if I had to choose,
External: Charter Cities as a theoretical theory at the moment seems promising for external redressing of state failures as there would be no negative impact on the state itself.
Internal: International reform, as the international society needs to stop using abusive methods to get resources from under developed, failed states. ( check Wenar to make sense of what I mean)
Please DO NOT use overly complicated words or overly political words/phrases.
I have attached a structure that SHOULD be followed when writing the essay. I have also provided an essay I wrote for this class, PLEASE try to follow the same style of my writing.
cite all sources.
Thank you.