Explain your Strengths, Weaknesses (needs for growth), Oppor…
Reflection.
individual task.
Choose a job position, or internship position that you would like to perform.
Conduct a personal S.W.O.T. analysis for yourself in relation to that position.
Reflect on their first semester mind map considering your personal values, the social, work-related, and universal values you wish create or live in tomake the difference.
Explain your Strengths, Weaknesses (needs for growth), Opportunities, and Threats.
If you want, you can analyze threats and opportunities based on the PEST-LE matrix (considering context: Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legaland Environmental aspects).
Put your critical SWOT information in a short cover letter addressed to the company’s Human Resource Manager.
1500 WORDS
PPD211 COURSE NAME Task brief & rubrics
Task
Save your time – order a paper!
Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines
Order Paper Now
• Reflection.
• individual task.
• Choose a job position, or internship position that you would like to perform.
• Conduct a personal S.W.O.T. analysis for yourself in relation to that position.
• Reflect on their first semester mind map considering your personal values, the social, work-related, and universal values you wish create or live in to
make the difference.
• Explain your Strengths, Weaknesses (needs for growth), Opportunities, and Threats.
• If you want, you can analyze threats and opportunities based on the PEST-LE matrix (considering context: Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal
and Environmental aspects).
• Put your critical SWOT information in a short cover letter addressed to the company’s Human Resource Manager.
Formalities:
• Wordcount: 1500-2000 words.
• Cover, References and Appendix are excluded of the total wordcount.
• Font: Times New Roman 12 pts, Line spacing 1.5.
• Text alignment: Justified.
• No need for table of contents.
• Name Surname, Course Code (PPD211) Group and sub–‐group number (ex. Group ABC – Subgroup B).
• Submission in pdf format.
• Context should be limited with your experiences, awareness, and perspectives you acquired during the course.
• If referencing or quotes are used, should be indicated in Harvard’s citation style.
Submission: Week 13 – Via Moodle (Turnitin). DDL: Sunday 16/01/2022 23:59 CEST.
Weight: This task is a 100% of your total grade for this subject.
It assesses the following learning outcomes:
• Outcome 1: define and evaluate the personal values and attitudes.
• Outcome 2: Assess personal social sustainability.
Rubrics
Exceptional 90-100 Good 80-89 Fair 70-79 Marginal fail 60-69
Knowledge & Understanding
(20%)
Student demonstrates excellent understanding of key concepts and uses vocabulary in an entirely appropriate manner.
Student demonstrates good understanding of the task and mentions some relevant concepts and demonstrates use of the relevant vocabulary.
Student understands the task and provides minimum theory and/or some use of vocabulary.
Student understands the task and attempts to answer the question but does not mention key concepts or uses minimum amount of relevant vocabulary.
Application (30%) Student applies fully relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class.
Student applies mostly relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class.
Student applies some relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class. Misunderstanding may be evident.
Student applies little relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class. Misunderstands are evident.
Critical Thinking (30%)
Student critically assesses in excellent ways, drawing outstanding conclusions from relevant authors.
Student critically assesses in good ways, drawing conclusions from relevant authors and references.
Student provides some insights but stays on the surface of the topic. References may not be relevant.
Student makes little or none of critical thinking insights, does not quote appropriate authors, and does not provide valid sources.
Communication (20%)
Student communicates their ideas extremely clearly and concisely, respecting word count, grammar and spellcheck
Student communicates their ideas clearly and concisely, respecting word count, grammar and spellcheck
Student communicates their ideas with some clarity and concision. It may be slightly over or under the wordcount limit. Some misspelling errors may be evident.
Student communicates their ideas in a somewhat unclear and unconcise way. Does not reach or does exceed wordcount excessively and misspelling errors are evident.
“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”
