Does your concept map illustrate the desired high-quality ou…
Does your concept map illustrate the desired high-quality outcomes of treatment in the context of your chosen case study?
· Did you use at least 3–5 sources of scholarly or professional evidence as the basis for your concept map?
o Note: You will need to further discuss the value and relevance of this evidence in your narrative. However, be sure to cite where specific evidence or sources were used in your concept map.
o The evidence you cite should be no more than five years old.
Part 2: Additional Evidence (Narrative)Justify the value and relevance of the evidence you used as the basis for your concept map.· Have you noted why the evidence you have presented in your concept map is valuable and relevant to the case study you are using as the basis for the concept map?
o Have you explained why each particular piece of evidence is appropriate to the case study you are using?
o Have you explained the linkage between the evidence and the specific metabolic or glucose-related aspects of the condition from your chosen case study?
o Have you explained why the evidence you have used is the best available? In other words, how is it linked to best practices, professional or regulatory guidelines, et cetera?
Analyze how interprofessional strategies applied to the concept map can lead to achievement of desired outcomes.· What interprofessional strategies in assignment help are most applicable to the context of the case study that you are using as the basis for the concept map?
o Why are these interprofessional strategies appropriate in the context of the case study and your concept map?
· What are the desired outcomes in your concept map (or for the case study that you are using)?
o How will the interprofessional strategies you deemed appropriate and applicable help to achieve the desired outcomes?
o What potential challenges might you need to address to best implement the interprofessional strategies and achieve the desired outcomes?
· Remember, the evidence you cite should be no more than five years old.
Address Generally Throughout Both PartsConstruct concept map and linkage to additional evidence in a way that facilitates understanding of key information and links.· Is your concept map clearly presented?
· Are the links between the evidence and your diagnostic, treatment, or other care decisions clear and justified?
· Is your writing in both the concept map and the narrative clear and professional?
· Is your writing free from errors?
· Is your narrative submission 2–3 pages (not including the title page and reference list)?
· Are you communicating in an ethical way?
o Are you communicating honestly?
Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style.· Did you use 3–5 sources in your assessment?
o Are the sources you used no more than five years old?
· Are your sources cited in APA format throughout the concept map and narrative?
· Have you included an attached reference list?
· Did you use the APA Work Template for the proper formatting and to include a running head and title page?
o No abstract is needed for this assessment.
·
·
· COLLEGE OF BANKING AND FINANCIAL STUDIES
· DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL STUDIES
· Assignment front sheet
· Assignment – 1
·
· Qualification Unit number and title
· Pearson BTEC Level 5 HND Diploma in Business
· Human Recourses Management Specialization Unit 45: Business Ethics
· Semester Batch
· IV Fall 2016-17
· Student name Assessor name
· Ms. Kifah Al-Saleh
· Student No. Internal Verifier (IV) name
· Mr. NiranjanShetty
· Date issued Completion date Submitted on
· 20.10.2016 04.11.2016
·
· Assignment title Understand different ethical perspectives in business & business objectives from an ethical perspective
·
· In this assessment you will have the
· Learning Learning Assessment opportunity to present evidence that Task Evidence
· Outcome outcome Criteria shows you are able to: no. (Page no)
· Understand 1.1 Explain the background and development
Place Your Order Here
