Describe a faulty generalization you have made, and critique…
text book
Paul, R. & Elder, L. (2012). Critical Thinking: Tools for taking charge of your learning and your life (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Save your time – order a paper!
Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines
Order Paper Now
apa style –
Question 1
Describe a faulty generalization you have made, and critique that generalization.
Your response should be at least 75 words in length. You are required to use at least your textbook as source material for your response. All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations.
Question 2
Explain three of the fallacies from the textbook, and then provide instances from your own life where you have witnessed these fallacies at work.
Your response should be at least 200 words in length. You are required to use at least your textbook as source material for your response. All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations.
Question 3
Describe the three types of thinkers, and present an example of each type from your own life.
Your response should be at least 500 words in length. You are required to use at least your textbook as source material for your response. All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations.
The assignment (1-2 pages)
Briefly describe the results of your personality test.
Briefly explain your values as they relate to work and family life.
Think about your personality and values as they relate to Erikson’s stage of Generativity vs. Stagnation as you answer these questions:
If you are NOT in the generativity stage yet, do you think your personality and values are predictive of what you will do in that stage of life? Describe your prediction or why you believe your personality and values would not be predictive.OR
If you ARE in the generativity stage, do you think there is a relationship between your personality, values, and generativity? Describe the relationship or why you think there is none.
Considering generativity as a continuum from most generative to most stagnant, on a scale of 1 to 10, where would you place yourself or your predicted self? Why?
Summarize your thoughts about the relevance of Erikson’s stage of generativity to your life based on your personality, values, and the activities in which you are engaged.
Note: Be sure to protect the identity of any persons you describe.
Support your Application Assignment with specific references to all resources used in its preparation. You are asked to provide a reference list only for those resources not included in the Learning Resources for this course.
“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”
